The Fayla Incident
From Evil-Unveiled
| Purpose: | To get a teen to reveal her identity and show herself to convicted pedophiles on Webcam. |
|---|---|
| Website Address: | |
| Affiliations: | |
| Synopsis: | |
| This incident is a very good example of how pedophiles behave regarding children, and how they bully them into getting what they want. | |
In September, 2007, a 15-year-old girl using the nickname "Fayla" started posting at GirlChat. She posted about her boyfriend, and her ex boyfriend, who she says is 25 and a sex offender. She posted about her friends, school, music, etc, and she made audio recordings on YouTube with her boyfriend. At first, she was well-received, though the pedophiles were being cautious. However, they encouraged her to continue creating audio on YouTube, which spoke up for "youth rights" and "inter-generational love." A bit later, they started flirting with her, and another teen, who says she is 13.
And then, suddenly, a month later, Nigel Oldfield, a dangerous convicted pedophile, who has a history of harassing sexual assault victims, started a thread called "Me smells P(J)ussy," which accused "Fayla" of being an anti-pedophile who also posts videos on YouTube. He and several others bullied her until she resorted to getting on her Webcam in order to prove who she is. The GirlChat Committee allowed this to continue until the end. Nigel Oldfield has now been banned for two days but not because he harassed and bullied a teenager on their board, but because he called one of the moderators a police officer. Their priorities are clear.
Update
He has since been banned permanently, due to our work. Had this article not been published, he would still be a member of GirlChat.
There is no telling what happened during that video session, but we know one thing: We were able to find out exactly who she was without bullying her into getting on Webcam. We were able to find out her full name (all five of them), her age, her date of birth, her location, her boyfriends and her school.
There is only one way to convey how horridly these people treated this young girl, and how they forced her to show herself on Webcam, and that is via quotes and screen shots. These conversations are a perfect example of how pedophiles manipulate children, and how dangerous they are to children online.
Contents |
The Beginning
In his first post about this, Nigel Oldfield links to an mp3 file he made which has both Fayla's voice and the anti-pedophile's voice playing at the same time. High technology, no doubt:
| Me smells P(J)ussy
Posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 12:35:36am Have a listen ... http://www.critest.com/MP3/PJussy.mp3 (defunct) Same url at link. Someone has been a naughty pussy. WM |
Though some people on GirlChat thought the whole thing was ridiculous, other pedophiles jump on the bandwagon:
| 'The principle of 'innocent before proven guilty'
Posted by Hen-Wen on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 04:13:24pm "The principle of "innocent before proven guilty" doesn't just apply to courts." Actually... yes it does. Nobody's talking about putting her in jail. If we had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, she'd be banned already. As WMC said, let each individual decide who Fayla is. As for me, I'm still waiting for her irrefutable proof. Also, don't give me that BS about "poor Fayla". If she's innocent, then she's been falsely accused *on the internet*. I'm sorry, but deal with it. |
One of the moderators tries to dispute Nigel's "evidence," though he does not tell him to stop his campaign of harassment. However, Nigel presents his "credentials" and "expertise," which, since it ends up that "Fayla" IS a teen, is quite absurd. He also makes it clear that he will not be cybersexing with her, since he believes that she is not a teen.
| Re: Results (that didn't take long, lol)
Posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:59:10pm [Hey man I had a listen to the file you sent. Tell your "brothers" to leave audio work to people who know what they're doing.] I have just as sophisticated kit as anyone requires and nearly 40 years of working with audio. [The similiarity is an auditory illusion caused by the voices being overlapped.] If that is the only thing which was being depended on. We have heard clean versions of both speakers. [The two people in the recording you sent me are not the same and don't even sound close.] This is not some fly-by-night. This is PJ. They plan and set up their stings for months and years. They would not make them identical, only the best they could, to be different. [You said they had the same inflections??? No they don't.] What I would do, is, I would speak with my own accent (Yorkshire twang) and then speak with a North Yorkshire or even Lancashire register. I would sound as similar as PE/F, but would be as different. For the second, I would then speak in my teaching voice (which is motivational and slighter higher pitched and more excitable). This would make them just as PE/F appear. I am not sure I would have to do any further audio processing, but I could. Because PJ are not stupid, and PJ are not, just lazy, I would use different mikes, with a different input stage, knowing, full well, that we are not stupid. [Those 2 girls are from different regions of the US and even a layman should be able to hear that.] What regions and based on what difference? [There are a few syllables that sound close, but that's the best I could find to support the "theory" that they're the same person.] So, our technical whizzkid has no real negation. [If that really is the same person, then she's a fucking wicked genious with some damn good equipment.] Absolutely not, and I have shown why. [I got 1000s of dollars worth of equipment here and I couldn't make either girl's voice sound like the others.] See above. [It's especially hard because the 2 girls are using different microphones, and the "anti" has a better mix that's compressed (not good, but still compressed).] See above. [Your friend (the younger girl) needs to buy a cheap compressor off ebay to stop popping her Ps, or at least get a fucking windscreen for the mic.] See above, issues that I had noted before this post. [I could be wrong though.] Indeed. [It's hard to tell with the shitty mix that dude put up.] Triangulation of factors, my audio friend, triangulation. [Tell the guy who mixed that to put up some clean samples of each voice and I can give you a 100% answer.] They are readily available on YT but it will not help. [Mixing the voices up is a shitty parlor trick that makes them sound way more alike than they are.] Just the teaser, before I released the rest. So, let the reader decide. I will not be cybersexing with Fayla for sometime in the far future. |
Someone asked if the administrators of GirlChat had a response to all of this, to which they replied:
| Not at this time.
Posted by GirlChat Committee on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:58:01am In reply to Does the Administration have a response to this? posted by Dissident on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:33:12am But we will, once the rest of the committee hears this evidence, we will discuss it and decide what to do. For now, we must all remember that it important to not jump to conclusions. Fayla might be a PJ mole, or she might not be. Anyone on this board could be working for PJ. For right now we must simply give her the benefit of the doubt. Unless she starts violating the GC rules or presents an immediate threat to the board and it's posters, she will continue to have the right to post here. In the event that it is proven that she is a PJ mole (as was DeepSouth), then we shall simply alert the board and make sure everyone is aware of that fact. Let this be yet another lesson to all of you about why you should never share any real life, personal information with anyone on this board unless you are willing to risk being outed to the world. We shall keep you all updated as our investigation proceeds. GirlChat Committee. |
Notice that they are saying that no one should ever give out identifying information, but they really don't have anything to say about Fayla, a minor, giving out her information.
"Fayla's" Responses and the Continuing Harassment
This is her first response. They edited her comment about which state she lives in, but it was just one more thing that confirmed our investigation.
| Quick Note:
Posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 03:48:19pm Okay, I’ve had enough reading for my stomach to handle. All I want to say to everyone is as follows:
|
As you can see in the screen shot above, many people commented and argued about this. In the midst of it, "Fayla" tries to take up for another poster Nigel is attacking, and this is his response to her:
| Re: Quick Note:
Posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 04:52:17pm In reply to Re: Quick Note: posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 04:47:54pm
webmanager@critest.com All formats accepted. |
Her response to someone asking her not to leave:
| Re: Or...
Posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 03:41:09pm
|
A response from Hen-Wen:
| Ah, good, you're up.
Posted by Hen-Wen on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 03:46:21pm
Don't be hurt "beyond all reasoning". There's no reason to be. I know that teenage girls aren't fragile flowers. |
Here, Nigel says that she was "talking dirty." Thing is, she never used any sort of erotic talk. She was simply being a teenager. That is how pedophiles view children.
| Re: Does the Administration have a response to thi
Posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:50:46am In reply to Re: Does the Administration have a response to thi posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:48:16am
You were just doing it like a kid. WM |
Here, she asks if she has to prove herself:
| Posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:39:38am
In reply to Re: Verdict: **Unquestionably the same person.** posted by Hen-Wen on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:37:19am
|
To which Hen-Wen replies:
| Posted by Hen-Wen on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:40:49am
In reply to Re: Verdict: **Unquestionably the same person.** posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:39:38am
|
"Fayla" then responds:
| Re: 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?'
Posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:49:56am In reply to 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?' posted by Hen-Wen on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:40:49am
|
Nigel's response:
| Re: 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?'
Posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:55:10am In reply to Re: 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?' posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:49:56am
Make a short face and voice video. Post it to me ... webmanager@critest.com. (With Admin's permission, here, of course ;) ) Or to Admin, here - you must trust them, you being so committed and all. We know you are nearly six feet and gangly. In one fell swoop, you prove me wrong and confirm your ID. Must be worth it - No? WM |
And she finally agrees that she has no choice but to reveal her identity to stop the harassment.
| Re: 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?'
Posted by Fayla on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 02:05:00am In reply to Re: 'Do I need to prove myself to be honest?' posted by webmanager_critest on Sunday, October 28 2007 at 01:55:10am
|
The Outcome
After days of harassment and pressure from pedophiles to reveal her identity, she finally did, and this is what Nigel Oldfield had to say about it:
| Fayla - The Outcome
Posted by webmanager_critest on Tuesday, October 30 2007 at 12:05:00am
I have apologised to Fayla ... she is not a 30 year old, wrinkly witch.
|
So, even though he Webcammed with her, he is still not sure; however, we are. Our investigation is solid and has been confirmed many times. And now, pedophiles all over GirlChat know where the girl lives, they have video of her and she is still doubted by them. The issue is being covered by mounds of other threads, and Nigel Oldfield, Hen-Wen and others, are hoping that it will be forgotten.
The GirlChat Committee finally responded to this, but only with a warning. They are absolutely correct about what he did, but did not step in until the damage was already done.
| That's enough, no more of this
Posted by BB on Tuesday, October 30 2007 at 08:17:25am
|
And, finally, her response to "The Outcome:"
| Re: Fayla - The Outcome
Posted by Fayla on Tuesday, October 30 2007 at 12:14:51am In reply to Fayla - The Outcome posted by webmanager_critest on Tuesday, October 30 2007 at 12:05:00am
|
So, the outcome was actually that Nigel Oldfield has once against proven that he is a dangerous pedophile and that he is often wrong.
More Info
If law enforcement or child protective services would like to have access to the information we found during our investigation, please contact us.
Contact Us
If you have any information regarding this site or the identities of any of the members, contact us at info@evil-unveiled.com.
|
Quick Navigation: Categories | Articles List | New Pages | Random Page | Current Events |





